My latest solution is having Magic-Resistant diseases, and making Cure Disease one-try. So, for example, the Grey Death, which is often fatal and has Magic Resistance 10, can be a real threat to a society. This seems to be the best one so far. I think it's also appropriate for some diseases, especially "true" leprosy, to be Cure Disease immune.
Why the Focus On Disease?
I think it's reasonable to ask why I worry about this. After all, no-one really wants to roleplay having cholera (roll 13 vs. HT 11: "OK, you poop yourself again and are Terribly Dehydrated.") For me, it's more a question of world-building than the actual gameplay. My gameworld is definitely late medieval Europe in inspiration, and even a cursory read of the time period should give you an idea of how constant and present the threat of disease was. Some, like leprosy, were a terror from the biblical age on. To have a universal panacea like Cure Disease really changes the tone away from what I'm looking for. Plus, while I don't want to constantly affect the PCs with nasty sicknesses, they should occasionally face an actual threat from it.
This is the actually the sort of thing that I often ponder when I'm working on more grim fantasy settings as well. Disease hugely shapes history, ancient cultures, even occult and religious beliefs (The word for "demon" and "disease" were synonymous in Sumerian, and exorcism and healing went hand in hand in the New Testament), but we never touch on it in fantasy gaming.
ReplyDeleteThe problem is as you say, of course. Disease might be "realistic," but does it create interesting gameplay? Working how to make disease create interesting gameplay would go a long way to making it viable in the typical fantasy game.